
There are things we know by experience like what applesauce tastes like, and things we know by memorization like how to spell Minneapolis and how to pronounce Natchitoches and what 9x6 is and why/how Jesus is the Savior of Sinners. There are things we know by experimentation like the speed of light and the circumference of the earth, and things we know through realization, like what's what and what needs to be done about it, and whether we are a mountain or a sea person, a pets or a no pets person. The people who allow someone else to do their thinking for them and know only what they are told are the saddest kind of people. And the most dangerous-- to themselves and to others. Which leads me to this: I have been reading a lot of poetry lately. Collected works reside in "the public domain" and are free or very inexpensive, and I have experimented with the possibilities and realized that anthologies are better sources of good (In my view) poetry than collected works are. There is a lot of bad (In my view) poetry in collected works. There is a lot of bad poetry generally, whether it has been collected or not. Knowing what is good or bad is like knowing whether you are a mountain or sea person, a pet person or a no pets person. We cannot allow someone else to tell us who we are, or, even worse, who we are supposed to be. Even if they are our father. Or our mother. Or, even worse, the preacher.
–0–
Gorgeous seascape. I do so agree with you about poetry and preachers. I have one anthology I’ve owned since 1962 and my Mother’s commonplace book created in 1934. Incomparable collections!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, the inner knowing can trump the best poetry. Marvelous image/artwork.
LikeLiked by 1 person