
Arthur Schopenhauer talks a lot (In "The World As Will And Representation") about "The Will to Life," without mentioning the Will to Power, or the Will to Create, or the Will to Have/Own/Possess, or the Will to Explore/Investigate/Inquire/Understand or the Will to Know/Do/Be... And I don't think we generate any of these out of our own reason and logic, as in, "I think I will will myself to power today." We are gripped by all of these Wills and forced into them against our will, compelled to serve them, obey them as though they are some mythic vision sweeping up out of the murky regions to claim us as its own and carry us off into an existence not of our design. Come back to the table, Arthur! We have some things to discuss! After spending forever talking about The Will to Life, he opens up another line of reasoning with the term "Representation," meaning "What we take the things we see to be." He goes on and own about how we cannot see things as-they-are but as they appear to us to be. But he thought we could see ourselves as we are, and not as we appear to ourselves to be, conveniently ignoring the 10,000 ways we do not know ourselves to be, and surprising ourselves to discover that we can yodel of all things for example, or our propensity to deny the truth about ourselves and refuse to acknowledge the things that are patently plain to everyone else. And the he goes off for endless pages on the phrase, "the principle of sufficient reason," which says, "nothing can exist without a reason for its existence," completely ignoring Sheldon Kopp's observation that "Some things can be experienced, but not understood, and some things can be understood, but not explained," and what good is a reason that cannot be explained? But my biggest complaint about Arthur's opus is that he never digs about in the place of wanting in our lives. Wanting drives us off cliffs and into deep water all of the time. We need a cure for ceaseless wanting. Some way to cut it off, to lay it aside, and be free of it for days at a time-- particularly when we want what we have no business having! What's the point of talking without having something helpful to say? What would help us most is knowing what needs doing and what doesn't-- and how to do what does, when, where and how it does, and leave what doesn't quite alone.
–0–
I did not want to put this in comments. Sharing something probably you know anyway – Johari’s Window (“an excellent tool for comparing self-perception to public perception.”) From your piece below: “Conveniently ignoring the 10,000 ways we do not know ourselves to be” Some of the ways we can know ourselves can be found by using a tool called “Johari’s Window”- ” https://www.implicitbiascleanse.com/uploads/1/0/8/5/10851850/johariwindow.pdf
When I first became aware of this tool in a group therapy session, it opened a window to understanding myself, especially the “Blind Area” – things others perceived about me that were unknown to me. Best,Sandy
sandraroggero@sbcglobal.net
LikeLike
Thanks for the link! We can never be too aware of ourselves, in a not-self-conscious kind of way, and being attentive to who we
“also are” is the on-going work of soul, and there is always “spinach in our teeth.”
LikeLike